Why did we open-source our inference engine? Read the post

Build healthcare agents with open source models

Superlinked gives your agent one API to read submitted records, retrieve current rules, extract evidence and return cited findings for human review.

Get started
See how our example agent checked CMS's published L1851 case

Your documentation review agent

Read the submitted record, check current criteria and cite the mismatch.

Review question Does the L1851 record meet the face-to-face timing requirement?
Reviewer finding No. CMS’s example records 7 months; the window is 6.

Your review context

Submitted records, current rules and prior review decisions.

CMS Compliance guidance Lower limb orthoses
ORDER Written order L1851
RECORD Practitioner record Medical necessity
POD Proof of delivery Face-to-face · 7 months
Browse all tasks
from sie_sdk import SIEClient
client = SIEClient(
api_key="sk-sie-…",
base_url="https://api.superlinked.com",
)
# Parse a document → clean markdown, tables and layout kept.
result = client.extract(
"modeldocling",
{"document": fileHTMLcms-lower-limb-orthoses.htmlbrowse},
)
print(result["data"]["markdown"])
document_bytes=$(base64 < 'cms-lower-limb-orthoses.html' | tr -d '\n')
curl https://api.superlinked.com/v1/extract/docling \
  -H "Authorization: Bearer sk-sie-…" \
  -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
  -d "{\"items\":[{\"document\":{\"data\":\"$document_bytes\",\"format\":\"html\"}}]}"
Build the "Doc to Markdown" capability into my app using the Superlinked Inference Engine (SIE).

Context
- SIE is an OpenAI-style inference API. Python SDK: `from sie_sdk import SIEClient`; TypeScript: `@superlinked/sie-sdk`.
- Base URL: https://api.superlinked.com (or my regional endpoint). Auth: Bearer key from env `SIE_API_KEY` (never hard-code it).
- Model: docling (SIE primitive: /extract). Keep the model id configurable.

Task
- Input: an uploaded document (PDF / Office / scan).
- Behaviour: return clean markdown for the document, preserving tables and reading order
- Call the selected SIE primitive once per request and map the response into your domain type.

Deliverables
- A typed client wrapper, an application-level function for this task, error handling for timeouts/empty input, and unit tests with a stubbed client.
- Wire it into my existing stack (ask me which framework if unclear) and add a short usage example.
Input HTML pagecms-l1851-insufficient-documentation.html
CMS HTML page crop stating the six-month face-to-face encounter requirementCMS HTML page crop showing the published L1851 insufficient-documentation example
import numpy as np
from sie_sdk import SIEClient
client = SIEClient(
api_key="sk-sie-…",
base_url="https://api.superlinked.com",
)
query = "queryFor CMS's published L1851 example, what was required, what was submitted, what timing gap caused insufficient documentation, and what payment action followed?"
documents = [
"document 1https://www.cms.gov/training-education/medicare-learning-networkr-mln/compliance/medicare-provider-compliance-tips/lower-limb-orthoses Page Last Modified: 02/11/2026 04:18 PM",
"document 2## Billing &amp; Coding Criteria",
"document 3We require prior authorization, a face-to-face encounter, and written order prior to delivery for HCPCS codes L1832 and L1851. Conduct the face-to-face encounter within the 6 months before prescribing the item.",
"document 4## Example of Improper Payments Due to Insufficient Documentation for Lower Limb Orthoses",
"document 5A supplier bills the claim for L1851 (Knee orthosis (KO), single upright, thigh and calf, with adjustable flexion and extension joint (unicentric or polycentric), medial-lateral and rotation control, with or without varus/valgus adjustment, prefabricated, off-the-shelf) and submits the following documentation per the review contractor's request:",
"document 6- Standard written order with correct HCPCS coding",
"document 7- Treating practitioner's medical record that has adequate medical necessity information",
"document 8- Proof of delivery with face-to-face encounter 7 months ago",
"document 9### What Documentation Was Missing?",
"document 10The doctor didn't document the face-to-face encounter within 6 months of proof of delivery.",
"document 11The review contractor completes the claim as an insufficient documentation error, and the MAC recoups payment.",
]
items = [{"text": query}, *({"text": d} for d in documents)]
vecs = client.encode("modelQwen/Qwen3-Embedding-4B", items)
mat = np.array([v["dense"] for v in vecs])
mat = mat / np.linalg.norm(mat, axis=1, keepdims=True)
scores = mat[1:] @ mat[0] # cosine similarity to the query
for i in np.argsort(scores)[::-1]:
print(f"{scores[i]:.3f} {documents[i]}")
import { SIEClient } from '@superlinked/sie-sdk';

const client = new SIEClient('https://api.superlinked.com', {
  apiKey: 'sk-sie-…',
});

const query = "For CMS's published L1851 example, what was required, what was submitted, what timing gap caused insufficient documentation, and what payment action followed?";
const documents = [
  "https://www.cms.gov/training-education/medicare-learning-networkr-mln/compliance/medicare-provider-compliance-tips/lower-limb-orthoses Page Last Modified: 02/11/2026 04:18 PM",
  "## Billing &amp; Coding Criteria",
  "We require prior authorization, a face-to-face encounter, and written order prior to delivery for HCPCS codes L1832 and L1851. Conduct the face-to-face encounter within the 6 months before prescribing the item.",
  "## Example of Improper Payments Due to Insufficient Documentation for Lower Limb Orthoses",
  "A supplier bills the claim for L1851 (Knee orthosis (KO), single upright, thigh and calf, with adjustable flexion and extension joint (unicentric or polycentric), medial-lateral and rotation control, with or without varus/valgus adjustment, prefabricated, off-the-shelf) and submits the following documentation per the review contractor's request:",
  "- Standard written order with correct HCPCS coding",
  "- Treating practitioner's medical record that has adequate medical necessity information",
  "- Proof of delivery with face-to-face encounter 7 months ago",
  "### What Documentation Was Missing?",
  "The doctor didn't document the face-to-face encounter within 6 months of proof of delivery.",
  "The review contractor completes the claim as an insufficient documentation error, and the MAC recoups payment.",
];

const items = [{ text: query }, ...documents.map((text) => ({ text }))];
const vecs = await client.encode('Qwen/Qwen3-Embedding-4B', items);
const [q, ...d] = vecs.map((v) => v.dense);
const cosine = (a: Float32Array, b: Float32Array) => {
  const dot = a.reduce((s, x, i) => s + x * b[i], 0);
  return dot / (Math.hypot(...a) * Math.hypot(...b));
};
const ranked = documents
  .map((doc, i) => ({ doc, score: cosine(q!, d[i]!) }))
  .sort((a, b) => b.score - a.score);
console.log(ranked);
# Encode the query + candidates in one batch, then rank by cosine.
curl https://api.superlinked.com/v1/encode/Qwen%2FQwen3-Embedding-4B \
  -H "Authorization: Bearer sk-sie-…" \
  -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
  -d "{\"items\":[{\"text\":\"For CMS's published L1851 example, what was required, what was submitted, what timing gap caused insufficient documentation, and what payment action followed?\"},{\"text\":\"https://www.cms.gov/training-education/medicare-learning-networkr-mln/compliance/medicare-provider-compliance-tips/lower-limb-orthoses Page Last Modified: 02/11/2026 04:18 PM\"},{\"text\":\"## Billing &amp; Coding Criteria\"},{\"text\":\"We require prior authorization, a face-to-face encounter, and written order prior to delivery for HCPCS codes L1832 and L1851. Conduct the face-to-face encounter within the 6 months before prescribing the item.\"},{\"text\":\"## Example of Improper Payments Due to Insufficient Documentation for Lower Limb Orthoses\"},{\"text\":\"A supplier bills the claim for L1851 (Knee orthosis (KO), single upright, thigh and calf, with adjustable flexion and extension joint (unicentric or polycentric), medial-lateral and rotation control, with or without varus/valgus adjustment, prefabricated, off-the-shelf) and submits the following documentation per the review contractor's request:\"},{\"text\":\"- Standard written order with correct HCPCS coding\"},{\"text\":\"- Treating practitioner's medical record that has adequate medical necessity information\"},{\"text\":\"- Proof of delivery with face-to-face encounter 7 months ago\"},{\"text\":\"### What Documentation Was Missing?\"},{\"text\":\"The doctor didn't document the face-to-face encounter within 6 months of proof of delivery.\"},{\"text\":\"The review contractor completes the claim as an insufficient documentation error, and the MAC recoups payment.\"}],\"params\":{\"output_types\":[\"dense\"]}}"
Build the "Search" capability into my app using the Superlinked Inference Engine (SIE).

Context
- SIE is an OpenAI-style inference API. Python SDK: `from sie_sdk import SIEClient`; TypeScript: `@superlinked/sie-sdk`.
- Base URL: https://api.superlinked.com (or my regional endpoint). Auth: Bearer key from env `SIE_API_KEY` (never hard-code it).
- Model: Qwen/Qwen3-Embedding-4B (SIE primitive: /encode). Keep the model id configurable.

Task
- Input: a query string plus a list of candidate documents.
- Behaviour: return the candidates ranked by semantic similarity to the query, with a score per candidate
- Encode the query and candidates in one batched /encode call, then rank by cosine similarity in the client. Do not call the API per candidate.

Deliverables
- A typed client wrapper, an application-level function for this task, error handling for timeouts/empty input, and unit tests with a stubbed client.
- Wire it into my existing stack (ask me which framework if unclear) and add a short usage example.
from sie_sdk import SIEClient
client = SIEClient(
api_key="sk-sie-…",
base_url="https://api.superlinked.com",
)
query = "queryFor CMS's published L1851 example, what was required, what was submitted, what timing gap caused insufficient documentation, and what payment action followed?"
documents = [
"document 1https://www.cms.gov/training-education/medicare-learning-networkr-mln/compliance/medicare-provider-compliance-tips/lower-limb-orthoses Page Last Modified: 02/11/2026 04:18 PM",
"document 2## Billing &amp; Coding Criteria",
"document 3We require prior authorization, a face-to-face encounter, and written order prior to delivery for HCPCS codes L1832 and L1851. Conduct the face-to-face encounter within the 6 months before prescribing the item.",
"document 4## Example of Improper Payments Due to Insufficient Documentation for Lower Limb Orthoses",
"document 5A supplier bills the claim for L1851 (Knee orthosis (KO), single upright, thigh and calf, with adjustable flexion and extension joint (unicentric or polycentric), medial-lateral and rotation control, with or without varus/valgus adjustment, prefabricated, off-the-shelf) and submits the following documentation per the review contractor's request:",
"document 6- Standard written order with correct HCPCS coding",
"document 7- Treating practitioner's medical record that has adequate medical necessity information",
"document 8- Proof of delivery with face-to-face encounter 7 months ago",
"document 9### What Documentation Was Missing?",
"document 10The doctor didn't document the face-to-face encounter within 6 months of proof of delivery.",
"document 11The review contractor completes the claim as an insufficient documentation error, and the MAC recoups payment.",
]
items = [{"id": str(i), "text": d} for i, d in enumerate(documents)]
ranked = client.score("modelQwen/Qwen3-Reranker-4B", {"text": query}, items)
for r in ranked["scores"]:
print(r["score"], documents[int(r["item_id"])])
import { SIEClient } from '@superlinked/sie-sdk';

const client = new SIEClient('https://api.superlinked.com', {
  apiKey: 'sk-sie-…',
});

const query = "For CMS's published L1851 example, what was required, what was submitted, what timing gap caused insufficient documentation, and what payment action followed?";
const documents = [
  "https://www.cms.gov/training-education/medicare-learning-networkr-mln/compliance/medicare-provider-compliance-tips/lower-limb-orthoses Page Last Modified: 02/11/2026 04:18 PM",
  "## Billing &amp; Coding Criteria",
  "We require prior authorization, a face-to-face encounter, and written order prior to delivery for HCPCS codes L1832 and L1851. Conduct the face-to-face encounter within the 6 months before prescribing the item.",
  "## Example of Improper Payments Due to Insufficient Documentation for Lower Limb Orthoses",
  "A supplier bills the claim for L1851 (Knee orthosis (KO), single upright, thigh and calf, with adjustable flexion and extension joint (unicentric or polycentric), medial-lateral and rotation control, with or without varus/valgus adjustment, prefabricated, off-the-shelf) and submits the following documentation per the review contractor's request:",
  "- Standard written order with correct HCPCS coding",
  "- Treating practitioner's medical record that has adequate medical necessity information",
  "- Proof of delivery with face-to-face encounter 7 months ago",
  "### What Documentation Was Missing?",
  "The doctor didn't document the face-to-face encounter within 6 months of proof of delivery.",
  "The review contractor completes the claim as an insufficient documentation error, and the MAC recoups payment.",
];
const items = documents.map((text, i) => ({ id: String(i), text }));
const ranked = await client.score('Qwen/Qwen3-Reranker-4B', { text: query }, items);
console.log(ranked.scores.map(({ itemId, score }) => ({ document: documents[Number(itemId)], score })));
curl https://api.superlinked.com/v1/score/Qwen%2FQwen3-Reranker-4B \
  -H "Authorization: Bearer sk-sie-…" \
  -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
  -d "{\"query\":{\"text\":\"For CMS's published L1851 example, what was required, what was submitted, what timing gap caused insufficient documentation, and what payment action followed?\"},\"items\":[{\"id\":\"0\",\"text\":\"https://www.cms.gov/training-education/medicare-learning-networkr-mln/compliance/medicare-provider-compliance-tips/lower-limb-orthoses Page Last Modified: 02/11/2026 04:18 PM\"},{\"id\":\"1\",\"text\":\"## Billing &amp; Coding Criteria\"},{\"id\":\"2\",\"text\":\"We require prior authorization, a face-to-face encounter, and written order prior to delivery for HCPCS codes L1832 and L1851. Conduct the face-to-face encounter within the 6 months before prescribing the item.\"},{\"id\":\"3\",\"text\":\"## Example of Improper Payments Due to Insufficient Documentation for Lower Limb Orthoses\"},{\"id\":\"4\",\"text\":\"A supplier bills the claim for L1851 (Knee orthosis (KO), single upright, thigh and calf, with adjustable flexion and extension joint (unicentric or polycentric), medial-lateral and rotation control, with or without varus/valgus adjustment, prefabricated, off-the-shelf) and submits the following documentation per the review contractor's request:\"},{\"id\":\"5\",\"text\":\"- Standard written order with correct HCPCS coding\"},{\"id\":\"6\",\"text\":\"- Treating practitioner's medical record that has adequate medical necessity information\"},{\"id\":\"7\",\"text\":\"- Proof of delivery with face-to-face encounter 7 months ago\"},{\"id\":\"8\",\"text\":\"### What Documentation Was Missing?\"},{\"id\":\"9\",\"text\":\"The doctor didn't document the face-to-face encounter within 6 months of proof of delivery.\"},{\"id\":\"10\",\"text\":\"The review contractor completes the claim as an insufficient documentation error, and the MAC recoups payment.\"}]}"
Build the "Rerank" capability into my app using the Superlinked Inference Engine (SIE).

Context
- SIE is an OpenAI-style inference API. Python SDK: `from sie_sdk import SIEClient`; TypeScript: `@superlinked/sie-sdk`.
- Base URL: https://api.superlinked.com (or my regional endpoint). Auth: Bearer key from env `SIE_API_KEY` (never hard-code it).
- Model: Qwen/Qwen3-Reranker-4B (SIE primitive: /score). Keep the model id configurable.

Task
- Input: a query string plus a list of candidate documents.
- Behaviour: reorder the candidates by true relevance to the query using the cross-encoder
- Call the selected SIE primitive once per request and map the response into your domain type.

Deliverables
- A typed client wrapper, an application-level function for this task, error handling for timeouts/empty input, and unit tests with a stubbed client.
- Wire it into my existing stack (ask me which framework if unclear) and add a short usage example.
from sie_sdk import SIEClient
client = SIEClient(
api_key="sk-sie-…",
base_url="https://api.superlinked.com",
)
result = client.extract(
"modelfastino/gliner2-large-v1",
{"text": "textThe doctor didn't document the face-to-face encounter within 6 months of proof of delivery. The review contractor completes the claim as an insufficient documentation error, and the MAC recoups payment."},
labels=[
"entity typemissing documentation",
"entity typeclaim result",
"entity typepayment action",
"entity typeorganization",
"entity typetime period",
],
)
for span in result["entities"]:
print(span["label"], span["text"])
import { SIEClient } from '@superlinked/sie-sdk';

const client = new SIEClient('https://api.superlinked.com', {
  apiKey: 'sk-sie-…',
});

const result = await client.extract(
  'fastino/gliner2-large-v1',
  { text: "The doctor didn't document the face-to-face encounter within 6 months of proof of delivery. The review contractor completes the claim as an insufficient documentation error, and the MAC recoups payment." },
  { labels: ["missing documentation","claim result","payment action","organization","time period"] },
);
console.log(result.entities);
curl https://api.superlinked.com/v1/extract/fastino%2Fgliner2-large-v1 \
  -H "Authorization: Bearer sk-sie-…" \
  -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
  -d "{\"items\":[{\"text\":\"The doctor didn't document the face-to-face encounter within 6 months of proof of delivery. The review contractor completes the claim as an insufficient documentation error, and the MAC recoups payment.\"}],\"params\":{\"labels\":[\"missing documentation\",\"claim result\",\"payment action\",\"organization\",\"time period\"]}}"
Build the "Named entities" capability into my app using the Superlinked Inference Engine (SIE).

Context
- SIE is an OpenAI-style inference API. Python SDK: `from sie_sdk import SIEClient`; TypeScript: `@superlinked/sie-sdk`.
- Base URL: https://api.superlinked.com (or my regional endpoint). Auth: Bearer key from env `SIE_API_KEY` (never hard-code it).
- Model: fastino/gliner2-large-v1 (SIE primitive: /extract). Keep the model id configurable.

Task
- Input: a block of text.
- Behaviour: return the named entities found in the text with their types
- Call the selected SIE primitive once per request and map the response into your domain type.

Deliverables
- A typed client wrapper, an application-level function for this task, error handling for timeouts/empty input, and unit tests with a stubbed client.
- Wire it into my existing stack (ask me which framework if unclear) and add a short usage example.
Output

Lower Limb Orthoses

Billing & Coding Criteria

Conduct the face-to-face encounter within the 6 months before prescribing the item.

Published L1851 example

  • Standard written order with correct HCPCS coding
  • Treating practitioner's medical record
  • Proof of delivery with face-to-face encounter 7 months ago

Missing documentation

The doctor didn't document the face-to-face encounter within 6 months of proof of delivery.

  • Extracts clean, agent-ready markdown
  • Keeps tables and layout intact
Output
## Example of Improper Payments Due to Insufficient Documentation for Lower Limb Orthoses
0.62
### What Documentation Was Missing?
0.57
We require prior authorization, a face-to-face encounter, and written order prior to delivery for HCPCS codes L1832 and L1851. Conduct the face-to-face encounter within the 6 months before prescribing the item.
0.55
The review contractor completes the claim as an insufficient documentation error, and the MAC recoups payment.
0.53
A supplier bills the claim for L1851 (Knee orthosis (KO), single upright, thigh and calf, with adjustable flexion and extension joint (unicentric or polycentric), medial-lateral and rotation control, with or without varus/valgus adjustment, prefabricated, off-the-shelf) and submits the following documentation per the review contractor's request:
0.51
https://www.cms.gov/training-education/medicare-learning-networkr-mln/compliance/medicare-provider-compliance-tips/lower-limb-orthoses Page Last Modified: 02/11/2026 04:18 PM
0.45
The doctor didn't document the face-to-face encounter within 6 months of proof of delivery.
0.44
- Proof of delivery with face-to-face encounter 7 months ago
0.44
## Billing &amp; Coding Criteria
0.44
- Standard written order with correct HCPCS coding
0.41
- Treating practitioner's medical record that has adequate medical necessity information
0.41
Top match at 0.62 · 11 candidates ranked
  • Ranks by meaning, not keyword overlap
  • Scores every candidate against your query
Output
The review contractor completes the claim as an insufficient documentation error, and the MAC recoups payment.
↑ up 100.98
## Example of Improper Payments Due to Insufficient Documentation for Lower Limb Orthoses
↑ up 20.87
The doctor didn't document the face-to-face encounter within 6 months of proof of delivery.
↑ up 70.68
A supplier bills the claim for L1851 (Knee orthosis (KO), single upright, thigh and calf, with adjustable flexion and extension joint (unicentric or polycentric), medial-lateral and rotation control, with or without varus/valgus adjustment, prefabricated, off-the-shelf) and submits the following documentation per the review contractor's request:
↑ up 10.65
We require prior authorization, a face-to-face encounter, and written order prior to delivery for HCPCS codes L1832 and L1851. Conduct the face-to-face encounter within the 6 months before prescribing the item.
↓ down 20.59
### What Documentation Was Missing?
↑ up 30.17
- Standard written order with correct HCPCS coding
↓ down 10.10
- Proof of delivery with face-to-face encounter 7 months ago
– held0.04
https://www.cms.gov/training-education/medicare-learning-networkr-mln/compliance/medicare-provider-compliance-tips/lower-limb-orthoses Page Last Modified: 02/11/2026 04:18 PM
↓ down 80.00
## Billing &amp; Coding Criteria
↓ down 80.00
- Treating practitioner's medical record that has adequate medical necessity information
↓ down 40.00
  • Reorders by true relevance
  • Scored by meaning, keyword-free
Output

The doctororganization didn't document the face-to-face encountermissing documentation within 6 monthstime period of proof of delivery. The review contractororganization completes the claim as an insufficient documentation errorclaim result, and the MACorganization recoups paymentpayment action.

doctororganizationface-to-face encountermissing documentation6 monthstime periodreview contractororganizationinsufficient documentation errorclaim resultMACorganizationrecoups paymentpayment action
7 matches across 5 types
  • Pulls typed entities straight from raw text

Compare models for this task

PRICE
$ / 1M input tokens
$0.02 OpenAI 3-small
$0.02 Voyage voyage-4-lite
$0.0377 SIE Arctic Embed L v2
Voyage voyage-4-large $0.12
SIE Qwen3 Embedding 4B $0.13
OpenAI 3-large $0.13
QUALITY
nDCG@10 · NFCorpus
SIE Qwen3 Embedding 4B 0.41
0.40
0.39
SIE Arctic Embed L v2 0.35
0.34
0.33
LATENCY
p50 ms
36ms SIE Arctic Embed L v2
44ms
50ms
SIE Qwen3 Embedding 4B 150ms
165ms
178ms
PRICE
$ / 1M input tokens $ / 1M pairs
$0.02 Voyage rerank-2.5-lite
$0.025 ZeroEntropy zerank-2
Voyage rerank-2.5 $0.05
Jina Reranker v3 $0.05
$6.63 SIE Qwen3 Reranker 0.6B
SIE Qwen3 Reranker 4B $61.89
QUALITY
nDCG@10 · AskUbuntu
SIE Qwen3 Reranker 4B 0.70
0.68
0.67
SIE Qwen3 Reranker 0.6B 0.65
0.64
0.63
LATENCY
p50 ms
60ms SIE Qwen3 Reranker 0.6B
75ms
150ms
SIE Qwen3 Reranker 4B 580ms
640ms
700ms
PRICE
$ / 1M input tokens
$0.0907 SIE GLiNER Multi
$0.186 SIE GLiNER2 Large
$0.2 OpenAI GPT-5.4 nano
$0.3 Google Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
OpenAI GPT-5.4 mini $0.75
Anthropic Claude Haiku 4.5 $1
QUALITY
F1 · CoNLL-03
SIE GLiNER Multi 0.60
0.58
0.57
SIE GLiNER2 Large 0.54
0.52
0.51
LATENCY
p50 ms
SIE GLiNER Multi 82ms
95ms
108ms
SIE GLiNER2 Large 130ms
145ms
158ms
PRICE
$ / 1k pages
$0.397 SIE docling
$1.5 AWS Textract
$1.5 Google Enterprise Document OCR
$1.5 Azure Document Intelligence Read
Mistral OCR 4 $4
QUALITY
olmOCR
SIE docling 0.32
0.30
0.30
0.29
0.29
LATENCY
p50 ms
SIE docling 214ms
240ms
260ms
270ms
300ms

Our example agent catches the timing error in CMS’s published case

View on GitHub
CMS requirement Face-to-face encounter Within 6 months
Published example Proof of delivery Encounter 7 months ago

Five model stages assemble and check the record

Read the packet Docling Doc to Markdown
Retrieve active policy BGE-M3 Search
Prioritize the criterion Qwen3-Reranker-4B Rerank
Extract codes and findings GLiNER multi v2.1 Named entities
Validate exact source spans GLiNER2 large v1 Named entities
Evidence check

7 months 6-month limit

Insufficient documentation
7 mo submitted encounter age
6 mo required window
35.2% 2024 improper payment rate
$91.2M projected improper payments

Deploy your way

Self-host with K8s

Easy & scalable deployment in your own cloud.

  • Terraform to your cloud in minutes
  • Apache-2.0, same engine as Cloud
  • Scales to zero, no bill between jobs
  • Per-tenant pools, no noisy neighbors
Agent prompt
Deploy SIE to our AWS account with the superlinked/sie/aws Terraform module. Docs: superlinked.com/docs/deploymentDeploy SIE to our GCP project with the superlinked/sie/google Terraform module. Docs: superlinked.com/docs/deploymentDeploy SIE to our Azure AKS cluster via helm install. Requirements: superlinked.com/docs/deployment
Deploy guide

Run locally

Run the same models on your own machine.

  • Runs on NVIDIA GPU or Apple Silicon
  • One command, no Docker or cluster
  • All 100+ Cloud models, fully offline
  • Same SDK and IDs, no code changes
pip install "sie-server[local]" && sie-server servepip install "sie-server[local]" && sie-server serve --device cuda
Quickstart

Contact us

Tell us about your use case and we'll get back to you shortly.

Apply for an inference grant

Free capacity on our hosted cluster for selected projects. Tell us what you run and we reply by email.